Deeply Divided Supreme Court Maintains the Covid-Crisis Fiction for the Sake of Border Security

Lifting Title 42 would cause mayhem at the border, but preventing such a crisis is the duty of the president and of Congress.

Share this story

U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C.

Amy Sparwasser/iStock/Getty Images

In a closely watched case on its emergency docket, a sharply divided Supreme Court issued an order on Tuesday night that keeps Title 42 in place for the next few months. In the meantime, the justices will give further consideration to a plea by 24 states that the provision be maintained until such time, if ever, as the federal government addresses the ongoing border catastrophe.

โ€œTitle 42โ€ is shorthand for a federal statute โ€” specifically, section 265 of Title 42, U.S. Code โ€” which empowers the government to close our borders to non-Americans due to a communicable-disease emergency. In this instance of course, that โ€œemergencyโ€ is the Covid-19 pandemic, even though it long ago ceased to be a true emergency, having passed on to the endemic stage. (At this point, nearly three years after its early-2020 emergence, Covid has become a disease that, like influenza, will be with us for the foreseeable future. It can be dangerous for some demographics โ€” particularly the elderly and those with certain comorbidities โ€” but it was already under control over a year ago, as evidenced by this typically thorough analysis by Jim Geraghty from October 2021).

Andrew C. McCarthy

About the Author

Andrew C. McCarthy

Andrew C. McCarthy is a senior fellow at National Review Institute, an NR contributing editor, and author of Ball of Collusion: The Plot to Rig an Election and Destroy a Presidency.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement