DOJ Gives Supreme Court Good Reasons to Reject Trump’s Appeal

Though the justices were unlikely to intervene at this juncture anyway, the solicitor general’s brief has given them ample cause not to.

Share this story

Left: U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C. Right: Former president Donald Trump at the CPAC conference in Orlando, Fla., February 26, 2022.

Will Dunham, Marco Bello/Reuters

The government has urged the Supreme Court to reject a request from former president Donald Trump that the Court intervene in ongoing litigation over Florida federal district judge Aileen Cannon’s appointment of a special master in the legal fight over documents seized in a search of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate.

The Justice Department explained its position in a 32-page brief filed on Tuesday by Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar. My assessment when Trump appealed to the high court last week was that the government would be pushing on an open door: The justices would want no part of this case, particularly at this premature stage when Trump has not been charged with a crime, when the case is currently before the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals on an expedited schedule, and when the flaws in Judge Cannon’s order involve a straightforward application of Eleventh Circuit precedent which doesn’t conflict with other federal appellate courts’ precedents.

Andrew C. McCarthy

About the Author

Andrew C. McCarthy

Andrew C. McCarthy is a senior fellow at National Review Institute, an NR contributing editor, and author of Ball of Collusion: The Plot to Rig an Election and Destroy a Presidency.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement