Elephants Crowd the Room as Chemical Abortion Gets a Senate Hearing

Some would prefer to ignore these inconvenient truths.

Share this story

Boxes of Mifepristone, the first pill in a medical abortion, are seen at Alamo Women’s Clinic in Carbondale, Ill., April 9, 2024.

Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters

Two things occurred to me during the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee hearing Wednesday on chemical abortion drugs, where I was a witness. The first was that there were several elephants in the room. The second was that numerous fallacies were propped up among the elephants.

The first elephant was the humanity of the unborn child. This elephant was studiously avoided by the minority’s witness, Dr. Nisha Verma, and by the minority’s committee members, perhaps because the humanity of the embryo, the fetus, and the unborn child is a scientific fact even among those who are pro-abortion. Alan F. Guttmacher, former president of Planned Parenthood, stated in his book Life in the Making, “We of today know that man is born of sexual union; that he starts life as an embryo within the body of the female . . . This all seems so simple and evident to us that it is difficult to picture a time when it was not part of the common knowledge.” Steve Jacobs, a Ph.D. student at the University of Chicago, surveyed 5,502 biologists from about 2016–2018. Almost 75 percent of those who identified as pro-choice said that human life begins at the moment of fertilization.

MW

About the Author

Monique Chireau Wubbenhorst

Monique Chireau Wubbenhorst has been an obstetrician-gynecologist for more than 30 years. She is currently a senior public policy fellow at the Notre Dame Center for Ethics and Culture, and an adjunct professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Indiana University School of Medicine.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement