The best thing about Fast & Furious, the fourth sequel in the franchise about underground street-racing and the first to feature all the surviving stars of the original, may come before the movie even starts. Iโ€™m referring, of course, to the rip-roaring trailer for Michael Mannโ€™s forthcoming gangster epic, Public Enemies, which stars Johnny Depp as notorious bank robber John Dillinger. In the middle of the trailer, he looks at a young lady and makes his pitch: โ€œI like baseball, movies, good clothes, fast cars, and you. What else you need to know?โ€ Itโ€™s a take-it-or-leave-it proposition, bold, blustery, and coolly masculine. Fast & Furious isnโ€™t as explicit in the way it sells itself, but itโ€™s got a lot in common: Switch out baseball and movies for handguns and fancy GPS systems, and youโ€™ll have a pretty good indication of what the movieโ€™s all about. You donโ€™t need to know anything about the previous films to enjoy this oneโ€™s crude amusements, nor much about the plot. After a terse, pleasurably absurd highway-hijacking sequence โ€” easily the filmโ€™s best โ€” set in the Dominican Republic gets things going, the film returns to Los Angeles and settles down to tell its story. A high-level drug dealer is recruiting drivers through illegal street races involving modified cars. Dominic Toretto (Vin Diesel), the street-racing star of the first film, wants to avenge a fallen friend killed by one of the dealerโ€™s minions. FBI agent Brian Oโ€™Conner (Paul Walker) wants to take down the drug runner. Both see the race as a way to get closer to their target, and sign up. High-velocity hijinks ensue. Like all the previous films in the series, Fast & Furious plays out as a crude parody of urban masculinity. Itโ€™s packed with violence, cars, buff bods, bravado, and babes, and, whenever possible, it tries to have all at once. The various permutations result in a film that essentially has only three types of scenes: car races and chases, macho one-upmanship between competing alpha males, and sultry flirtations with scantily clad young women. (Sample male-female exchange: โ€œSomething interesting about this car?โ€ โ€œJust examining the body work.โ€) All of this is cut to a thumping rock and hip-hop soundtrack, and interspersed with what seem to be more or less random shots of sub-Maxim model flesh (the filmโ€™s title actually blinks rapidly in and out of shots of gyrating female bodies). As gender roles go, the filmโ€™s not breaking any barriers: Women are almost exclusively treated as objects, and the only one with something like a real role is continually shown buying and preparing meals for the two male leads. Why did a movie like this even need to occur? In part, because Vin Dieselโ€™s career needed saving: He was poised to become the next big-time action star, but his role choices have made returning to the franchise that made him seem like an A-list contender look like the only option. For its part, the film does everything in its limited power to build up Dieselโ€™s rugged persona, photographing him, for example, in front of towering oil-well pumps โ€” which either suggests a sort of industrial-quality strength and power or reveals how the sound-production team dug out a space deep enough for the starโ€™s gravelly, core-of-the-earth voice. Try as the filmmakers might to play up Dieselโ€™s macho cool, though, they canโ€™t hide the signs of age: a bit of paunch, a visible double chin. But such are the perils of late-career comebacks: Itโ€™s tough to be a hero to the kids when youโ€™re past 40. Paul Walker, whoโ€™s always seemed to struggle to match Keanu Reevesโ€™s expressiveness, fares even worse. No doubt heโ€™s hoping to get a career boost from starring opposite Diesel once again. But when he confesses to Mia (the thoroughly unmemorable Jordana Brewster), his fling from the first movie, โ€œI lied to you. I lied to everybody,โ€ and she responds, โ€œMaybe youโ€™re lying to yourself,โ€ itโ€™s tough not to think thatโ€™s a lesson Walker ought to draw about his acting career. Still, worrying about acting in a film like this is like worrying about fat in a double cheeseburger: It misses the whole point. As jocular jock-centric diversions go, Fast & Furious works well enough. Itโ€™s no meathead masterpiece, of course, failing to achieve the brutal B-movie elegance of its prime competitors, the Transporter films. But itโ€™s got girls and guns and fast cars aplenty. As Deppโ€™s John Dillinger might say, what else do you need to know?

โ€“ Peter Suderman blogs at The American Scene.