For obvious reasons, the notion that the decisions of federal public-health officials should not be subject to judicial review is a dangerous one.
Share this story
Dr. Anthony Fauci answers questions during a Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee hearing in Washington, D.C., January 11, 2022.
Greg Nash/Pool via Reuters
Anthony Fauci is one of those perverse public figures who appears to be remorselessly committed to living down to the expectations of his bitterest critics.
Speaking to CBS News last Thursday, Fauci made a bizarre claim: “The principle of a court overruling a public-health judgment by a qualified organization like the CDC is disturbing in the precedent that it might send.”
About the Author
Kevin D. Williamson is a former fellow at National Review Institute and a former roving correspondent for National Review.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Anthony Fauci is one of those perverse public figures who appears to be remorselessly committed to living down to the expectations of his bitterest critics.
Speaking to CBS News last Thursday, Fauci made a bizarre claim: “The principle of a court overruling a public-health judgment by a qualified organization like the CDC is disturbing in the precedent that it might send.”
By continuing, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.
About the Author
Kevin D. Williamson is a former fellow at National Review Institute and a former roving correspondent for National Review.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Comments