Flying the Transgender Flag in the Federal Courts

You might think it would be obvious that a federal court should not take sides on a divisive social issue that is likely to come before that court. But in the name of “inclusivity” during pride month, the federal courts are doing just that.

National Review has obtained a memorandum sent to federal judges and other employees of the federal-court system recognizing Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer (LGBTQ+) Pride Month and promoting a training session for federal employees that will “explore the common misnomers associated with gender, why gender inclusivity is essential, and how to professionally navigate gender identity in the workplace.”

About the Author

Dan McLaughlin

Dan McLaughlin is a senior writer at National Review Online and a fellow at National Review Institute.

Featured Tags

You might think it would be obvious that a federal court should not take sides on a divisive social issue that is likely to come before that court. But in the name of “inclusivity” during pride month, the federal courts are doing just that.

National Review has obtained a memorandum sent to federal judges and other employees of the federal-court system recognizing Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer (LGBTQ+) Pride Month and promoting a training session for federal employees that will “explore the common misnomers associated with gender, why gender inclusivity is essential, and how to professionally navigate gender identity in the workplace.”