Garland’s Sleight of Hand in Hunter’s Sweetheart Plea Deal

The attorney general was duty-bound to appoint a special counsel — he can’t pawn off the responsibility on any subordinate.

Share this story

U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland listens to a question as he departs a news conference at the Department of Justice in Washington, D.C., March 7, 2023.

Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters

It has been quite something to watch Delaware U.S. attorney David Weiss squirm.

Sweating him on one side are the credible whistleblower allegations by law-enforcement agents: He obviously told them that he was not the deciding official when it came to whether criminal charges should be brought against Hunter Biden. Pressuring him just as hard on the other side is Weiss’s boss, Attorney General Merrick Garland, who in his now-familiar slippery style insists that Weiss was always the deciding official and was instructed that, if he ran into any interference, he needed only to ask Garland for special-counsel authority and he would be permitted to file any charge in any district throughout the country, regardless of whether the Biden-appointed U.S. attorneys in those districts agreed.

Andrew C. McCarthy

About the Author

Andrew C. McCarthy

Andrew C. McCarthy is a senior fellow at National Review Institute, an NR contributing editor, and author of Ball of Collusion: The Plot to Rig an Election and Destroy a Presidency.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement