Halligan’s ‘Correction’ of the Record Sparks More Intrigue About Comey Indictment

Why did the DOJ create a second indictment document that makes it look like no charge was rejected?

Share this story

Left: Attorney Lindsey Halligan looks on during an executive order signing in the Oval Office of the White House, March 31, 2025. Right: Former FBI director James Comey speaks at George Washington University in Washington, D.C., April 30, 2018.

Al Drago/Getty Images, Jonathan Ernst/Reuters

Sometimes, we “solve” one problem by making another one worse. That is what Lindsey Halligan may have done in undertaking to “correct” the record of the hearing that took place Wednesday in the Trump Justice Department’s prosecution of former FBI Director James Comey.

Halligan, of course, was installed by President Trump as the interim U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVa). That was after Trump banished Halligan’s predecessor, Erik Siebert, for declining to prosecute Comey and another Trump political enemy, New York Attorney General Letitia James. It was Halligan who presented the Comey case to an EDVa grand jury on September 25.

Andrew C. McCarthy

About the Author

Andrew C. McCarthy

Andrew C. McCarthy is a senior fellow at National Review Institute, an NR contributing editor, and author of Ball of Collusion: The Plot to Rig an Election and Destroy a Presidency.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement