Hegseth’s Pentagon Reshuffle Makes Little Operational Difference — and That’s a Big Problem

Under the current system, it is irrelevant that the Navy secretary and professional head of the U.S. Army were sacked mid-war. This is not a tenable situation.

Share this story

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth holds a briefing on the Iran war, at the Pentagon in Washington, D.C., April 24, 2026.

Kevin Lamarque/Reuters

Navy Secretary John Phelan was unceremoniously sacked on April 22. The Navy secretary is responsible for training, supplying, and organizing the service as well as a host of other administrative tasks that are essential, including building more ships more quickly. However, the days when Lincoln’s navy secretary, Gideon Welles, exercised direct control over naval operations are long gone.

The same disconnect exists today between military service chiefs and operational control of forces. The former do not maintain operational control over the latter. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth’s dismissal of U.S. Army Chief of Staff Randy George was remarkable not for its impact, but its lack of impact on operational issues. The reality is that the Iran war has demonstrated the extraordinary power the Joint Staff wields, compared to the service chiefs.

Seth Cropsey

About the Author

Seth Cropsey

Seth Cropsey is president of Yorktown Institute. He served as a naval officer and as deputy undersecretary of the Navy. The U.S. Naval Institute Press published his most recent book, co-authored with Harry Halem, Breaking the New Axis: A U.S. Grand Strategy for Eurasia, in April.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement