Editor’s note: This is the second in a series of articles on the leaked Dobbs draft opinion and its implications.
One reason for the continuing outcry over the leaked draft opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization is that if the final decision follows the reasoning of the leaked draft, it will do more than overturn Roe v. Wade and upend the issue of abortion. It will represent a watershed moment in American judicial history and constitutional thought, potentially restoring a balance between the three branches of government that conservatives have long sought. However, the aftermath may also disappoint more combative conservative intellectuals who seek to replace liberalism’s tottering foundations.







Comments