How Utah Has Turned Religious Freedom from a Controversy to a Consensus

Utah leads the way in averting religious-freedom conflicts through consensus protections.

Share this story

Utah state capitol building in Salt Lake City, Utah

Maciej Bledowski/Getty Images

Georgia and Iowa are considering legislation to protect religious practice of state residents from burdens imposed by state and local government. Sounds innocuous enough, but not to some. The headline of a local news report on Iowa’s bill insinuates that the proposal is partisan and cynical (note the scare quotes): “Iowa Senate Republicans pass ‘religious freedom’ bill.” An Associated Press story on Georgia’s bill is more measured but still accusatory: “Georgia bill aims to protect religious liberty. Opponents say it’s a license to discriminate.”

These are examples of how, increasingly in recent years, the media narrative has framed religious freedom as a controversial “culture war” issue. The growing number of religious-freedom rulings from the U.S. Supreme Court are depicted as pitting religious freedom against other rights. State challenges involving religious freedom arise in education, health care, and even cake decorating. State efforts draw boycotts for adopting laws patterned after federal religious-freedom protections.

WC

About the Author

William C. Duncan

William C. Duncan is the Religious Freedom Policy Fellow at Sutherland Institute, an independent, nonpartisan public-policy think tank in Salt Lake City, Utah.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement