Minnesota ERA Proposal: In Minnesota, Push for ERA Threatens Freedoms, Equality

On Monday, May 13, progressive members of the Minnesota house of representatives brought all their radical social policies to the floor in one fell swoop with a vote on the so-called “Equal Rights Amendment” (ERA). If they are passed by both the Minnesota house and senate, there is no requirement that ballot proposals be signed by the governor. The proposed amendment would be put before voters as a ballot question in an upcoming election, likely in November 2026, and a majority vote is needed to adopt the amendment to the state constitution.

Proponents claim that the ERA is needed because it would guarantee equal rights to all Minnesotans. The truth is quite different.

RD

About the Author

Rebecca Delahunt

Rebecca Delahunt serves as the director of public policy with Minnesota Family Council.

RK

About the Author

Renee K. Carlson

Renee K. Carlson serves as general counsel for True North Legal and Minnesota Family Council.

Featured Tags

On Monday, May 13, progressive members of the Minnesota house of representatives brought all their radical social policies to the floor in one fell swoop with a vote on the so-called “Equal Rights Amendment” (ERA). If they are passed by both the Minnesota house and senate, there is no requirement that ballot proposals be signed by the governor. The proposed amendment would be put before voters as a ballot question in an upcoming election, likely in November 2026, and a majority vote is needed to adopt the amendment to the state constitution.

Proponents claim that the ERA is needed because it would guarantee equal rights to all Minnesotans. The truth is quite different.