by Rich Lowry
The Supreme Court case on ‘LGBTQ-inclusive’ books shows how unfair he was.
Share this story
CBS Evening News anchor Scott Pelley attends a gala in New York City, November 19, 2015.
Neilson Barnard/Getty Images for Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
Last year, 60 Minutes did a segment on an attempted book ban in a South Carolina town that could have been written by ChatGPT.
The overwhelming sense of it was that such “bans” — or the removal of inappropriate material from libraries and classrooms — are based on hoaxes perpetrated by paranoid and hateful church ladies.
About the Author
Rich Lowry is the editor in chief of National Review.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Last year, 60 Minutes did a segment on an attempted book ban in a South Carolina town that could have been written by ChatGPT.
The overwhelming sense of it was that such “bans” — or the removal of inappropriate material from libraries and classrooms — are based on hoaxes perpetrated by paranoid and hateful church ladies.
By continuing, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.
About the Author
Rich Lowry is the editor in chief of National Review.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Comments