It’s a Mistake for the U.S. to Leave Niger

Arguments for American withdrawal from the African nation may seem plausible, but they don’t stand up to scrutiny.

Share this story

U.S. Air Force defenders assigned to the 409th Expeditionary Security Forces Squadron approach a simulated threat during a training exercise at Air Base 201, Niger, November 4, 2023.

Technical Sergeant Rose Gudex/U.S. AIr Force

After “difficult” negotiations, the U.S. and the government of Niger have agreed to a complete withdrawal, by mid September, of U.S. military personnel from bases in Niger. Since the military coup last July, which ousted President Mohamed Bazoum, relations between the U.S. and Niger’s military junta have steadily worsened. To that extent, at least, the recent announcement provided reassurance that our personnel would not simply be summarily ejected.

Some would have it that our departure from Niger is of little moment. A case for this proposition was made in late March here at National Review by Daniel DePetris. DePetris correctly noted that the purpose of our military presence in Niger was to “monitor” terrorist activity across the Sahel region of West Africa and concedes that this is a growing problem in West Africa. He observes that “one can reasonably expect to see more terrorist activity in Niger with less U.S. eyes in the sky,” noting, again correctly, that the Islamic State and al-Qaeda now view the region as their “main base of operations.” Finally, there is the acknowledgement that Russia and China, already well-represented across Africa, will likely take advantage of the opening provided by the U.S. departure.

James H. McGee

About the Author

James H. McGee

James H. McGee is a nuclear security and counterterrorism professional. His most recent novel, The Zebras from Minsk, was featured among National Review’s favorite books in 2025.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement