Judge Cannon’s Flawed Order to Suppress Jack Smith’s Report on the Mar-a-Lago Documents Caper

Federal courts do not actually have sweeping ‘supervisory authority’ over the DOJ.

Share this story

Judge Aileen Cannon, left, and then–Special Prosecutor Jack Smith, right

Southern District of Florida, Leah Millis/Reuters

This is the first of two columns on what is shaping up as a battle by President Trump and his Justice Department to discredit as illegitimate the Biden Justice Department’s two criminal prosecutions of Trump — the Mar-a-Lago documents case and the January 6 case, which involved the 2020 presidential election. The controversy crystallized this past week when Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee, forbade the Justice Department from disclosing Biden DOJ Special Counsel Jack Smith’s final report on the Mar-a-Lago investigation.

Judge Aileen Cannon, the Trump appointee to the federal district court in South Florida who presided over and eventually dismissed felony charges against Donald Trump in the Mar-a-Lago classified-documents case, has granted the now-president’s motion to bar the Justice Department from publicizing the final report submitted by prosecutor Jack Smith. The ruling was made in a 15-page order Judge Cannon issued on Monday.

Andrew C. McCarthy

About the Author

Andrew C. McCarthy

Andrew C. McCarthy is a senior fellow at National Review Institute, an NR contributing editor, and author of Ball of Collusion: The Plot to Rig an Election and Destroy a Presidency.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement