Make Ukraine Costly for Putin — Not America

Even though there is no appetite in the U.S. or Europe for ground troops, that doesn’t mean it needs to be a cakewalk to Kyiv.

Share this story

Russian President Vladimir Putin (left) and Chief of the General Staff of Russian Armed Forces Valery Gerasimov watch the Zapad-2017 war games at a military training ground in the Leningrad Region, Russia, in 2017.

Sputnik/Mikhail Klimentyev/Kremlin via Reuters

The Russian invasion of Ukraine has triggered a vigorous debate about the proper role for the United States. If we set aside those who are parroting Vladimir Putin’s position or those waxing on about American obligations to Ukraine, most of the real debate concerns what the U.S. should be doing within a range of certain parameters.

On one end, there are noninterventionists who argue that it is not in the U.S. national interest to get in the middle of a conflict between Russia and Ukraine and that, therefore, we should do little or nothing in response to Putin’s invasion. On the other end, there are those who argue that we should do everything we can to help Ukraine short of putting U.S. boots on the ground. It’s in between those two points where much of the debate is really playing out.

Philip Klein

About the Author

Philip Klein

Philip Klein is the editor of National Review Online.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement