Mike Pence’s Immunity Claim Sure Seems Frivolous

He appears to be laying the groundwork to explain to GOP voters that he took extraordinary measures to try to avoid testifying about Trump. It could backfire.

Share this story

Then-vice president Mike Pence talks to the media at Joint Base Andrews, Md., October 5, 2020.

Erin Scott/Reuters

Citing an unidentified person said to be familiar with his plans, the New York Times reports that former vice president Mike Pence will argue that the Constitution’s speech-or-debate clause gives him immunity from testifying in the grand-jury investigation of former president Donald Trump’s efforts to reverse the outcome of the 2020 election won by Joe Biden.

We noted last week that Jack Smith, the special counsel in the Trump investigation, has subpoenaed the former vice president. If the Times is correct about Pence’s intentions, his claim is frivolous and should be rejected swiftly.

Andrew C. McCarthy

About the Author

Andrew C. McCarthy

Andrew C. McCarthy is a senior fellow at National Review Institute, an NR contributing editor, and author of Ball of Collusion: The Plot to Rig an Election and Destroy a Presidency.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement