PlusSports

Don’t Ruin Minor League Baseball

Proposed changes would diminish the game’s precious localized character. It’s not clear that they would even reduce the costs for MLB.

Share this story

Syracuse Mets right fielder Travis Taijeron (19) catches a throw from pitcher Tyler Bashlor (10) to record an out during the seventh inning at NBT Bank Stadium in Syracuse, N.Y., April 25, 2019.

Gregory J. Fisher-USA TODAY Sports

Most sports fans would be willing to make just about any concession if it meant that their favorite sports could return to action. But there are reasons for baseball fans to be wary of the apparent agreement, between Major League Baseball (MLB) and its minor-league affiliates, on a Professional Baseball Agreement (PBA) that would nix up to 42 minor-league clubs from the 160 affiliate teams that Minor League Baseball (MiLB) currently comprises.

While MiLB officials initially resisted the proposed contraction — which I detailed here back in December — Baseball America’s J. J. Cooper reported that they were reconsidering the proposal in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic. Cooper, who cited anonymous sources in his report, claimed that “multiple sources with knowledge of the negotiations say MiLB will indicate that it agrees to 120 affiliated teams in a new PBA” and that the two sides had “already found common ground on a number of the major outstanding issues that MLB deputy commissioner Dan Halem laid out publicly in a letter to members of Congress last November.”

John Hirschauer

About the Author

John Hirschauer

John Hirschauer is a former William F. Buckley Jr. Fellow in Political Journalism at National Review Institute.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement