PlusArts

To the 1619 Project: Use More Art, Less Fake History

Look at art before jumping to conclusions.

Share this story

The Gulf Stream, 1899, by Winslow Homer. Oil on canvas.

Metropolitan Museum of Art, Catharine Lorillard Wolfe Collection, Wolfe Fund, 1906

The 1619 Project, prepared by the New York Times and the Pulitzer Foundation, has taken plenty of hits for factual and intellectual sloppiness and its elevation of ideology โ€” its high-end race baiting โ€” over historical truth. The Project, published in August 2019 as a 100-page standalone issue of the New York Times Magazine, rewrites American history to put anti-black racism at the center of our political, social, and economic evolution since 1619, when 20 slaves arrived in Jamestown, Va. When a journalist starts a story with two whoppers โ€” American patriots rebelled in 1776 to protect the slave system and โ€œall men are created equalโ€ was self-serving rubbish โ€” Iโ€™m left in a skeptical frame of mind.

Of course, racism isnโ€™t the gas that powers the American experiment. Itโ€™s making money. Still, while racism isnโ€™t, as the Times insists, โ€œour defining feature,โ€ slavery and its aftermath are Americaโ€™s most enduring tragedies. The 1619 Project is a poignant cultural event rooted in genuine, justifiable aggrievement. In reading it, I learned a lot.

Brian T. Allen

About the Author

Brian T. Allen

Brian T. Allen is National Reviewโ€™s art critic.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement