No, Firing Jack Smith Would Not Be an Obstruction of Justice

Justice Department prosecutors are mere delegates, permitted to exercise the president’s power at the president’s pleasure.

Share this story

Special Counsel Jack Smith makes a statement to reporters at Smith’s offices in Washington, D.C., August 1, 2023.

Jonathan Ernst/Reuters

At The Hill, Penn law professor Claire Finkelstein offers what I’d call a “government lawyers rule the world” argument that Biden-Harris DOJ special counsel Jack Smith must not drop the charges against President-elect Trump. (As I noted last week, Smith and the DOJ appear prepared to do just that. It’s been widely reported that Smith will leave his post before President Trump is sworn in on January 20.)

In a nutshell, Professor Finkelstein contends that guidance from the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel, on which Smith and the DOJ rely, is either wrong or inapplicable. She adds that Trump could be guilty of obstruction of justice if he (a) fires Smith (after Smith has followed her advice and declined to dismiss the case) and (b) then directs his Justice Department to dismiss the case.

Andrew C. McCarthy

About the Author

Andrew C. McCarthy

Andrew C. McCarthy is a senior fellow at National Review Institute, an NR contributing editor, and author of Ball of Collusion: The Plot to Rig an Election and Destroy a Presidency.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement