Obama Is Wrong about the Fairness Doctrine

Far from saving democracy from propaganda, the Fairness Doctrine was an anti-democratic regulatory weapon for suppressing political dissent.

Share this story

Former-President Barack Obama at an event to tout the Affordable Care Act at the White House in Washington, D.C., April 5, 2022.

Leah Millis/Reuters

Last week, President Barack Obama expressed his worries about “democratic backsliding” in a speech at Stanford University, blaming social-media platforms for spreading disinformation at an unprecedented pace using algorithms that through “subtle manipulations” promote conspiracism, racism, and sexism.

Obama raised these concerns only a few days before Elon Musk’s $44 billion purchase of Twitter under the banner of defending free online speech, leading to expectations that Twitter would further relax its content-moderation policies. But while both Musk and Obama have described themselves as “free speech absolutists,” Obama means something very different by the phrase than Musk does.

PM

About the Author

Paul Matzko

Paul Matzko is a historian and research fellow at the Cato Institute. He has written about the Fairness Doctrine in The Radio Right: How a Band of Broadcasters Took on the Federal Government and Built the Modern Conservative Movement (Oxford University Press, 2020).

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement