Originalists Should Not Make Common Cause with Israel’s Radical Judicial Reformers

Stripping the Israeli High Court of its independence will not fix the nation’s politics.

Share this story

Bezalel Smotrich arrives to attend a weekly cabinet meeting in Jerusalem, June 24, 2019.

Menahem Kahana/Pool via Reuters

Israelis went to the polls today for the fifth time in four years. They faced a stark choice. On one side, the change coalition, led by incumbent prime minister Yair Lapid, represented a more liberal, secular conception of Zionism and promises to end Benjamin Netanyahu–era divisiveness once and for all. On the other, the nationalist and ultra-Orthodox parties, with Likud and former prime minister Netanyahu at their helm, aimed to ground state policy in halakha, Jewish law, and a non-conciliatory approach to matters of national security. As of this writing, polls just closed; early (albeit unreliable) exit polling gives the edge to Netanyahu’s coalition.

One of the issues that got a lot of attention in this race, especially in the foreign press, was the mainstreaming of far-right Kahanist leader Itamar Ben-Gvir. Ben-Gvir, whose Kach Party has been banned in Israel and designated a terrorist organization by both Israel and (until recently) the U.S., considers himself a disciple of Meir Kahane, the ultranationalist rabbi who was influenced by Stokely Carmichael, founder of the Black Panthers. Much like Kahane (who was assassinated in New York in 1990), Ben-Gvir has been found guilty of several terrorism-related offenses.

Bobby Miller

About the Author

Bobby Miller

Bobby Miller is an ISI Fellow at National Review and a graduate student at Georgetown University.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement