Reform Our Cities, Not Just the Police

All too often, law-enforcement officers are tasked with handling responsibilities that society broadly has failed to address.

Share this story

New York Police officers in Times Square in 2013.

Eduardo Munoz/Reuters

Minnesota prosecutors have filed second-degree murder and aiding-and-abetting charges against the police officers who participated in the killing of George Floyd last month. While nationwide protests have sometimes descended into violence and looting, they have also successfully increased the pressure for policing reforms. Liberals have put forward a package of modest changes, giving conservatives the opportunity to propose a truly radical program to address our failing inner cities.

Under the Constitution, the primary responsibility for criminal-law enforcement lies with the states, not the federal government. Maintaining law and order and protecting public health and safety fall squarely within the “police powers” reserved to the states under the Tenth Amendment. While the federal government plays a significant role in regulating interstate crime and sending money and support to states, the Constitution gives Washington, D.C., no explicit power to handle garden-variety crime.

John Yoo

About the Author

John Yoo

John Yoo is the Thomas W. Smith Senior Fellow at the Civitas Institute, University of Texas at Austin; Emanuel S. Heller Professor of Law at the University of California at Berkeley; and a nonresident senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. He is a co-author of the just-released two-volume American Constitutional Law (Routledge, 2026).

HC

About the Author

Horace Cooper

Horace Cooper is the co-Chair of Project 21 and the author of How Trump is Making Black America Great Again.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement