In the pages of America’s newspapers and magazines, there is a debate raging over how best to “reform” the Supreme Court.
My contribution is as follows: I reject the premise.
The Supreme Court does not need altering — it has not done anything wrong.
Share this story
Left: Rep. Jamie Raskin (D., Md.) speaks during a hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., May 18, 2026. Right: The U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., May 18, 2026.
Tom Brenner, Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters
In the pages of America’s newspapers and magazines, there is a debate raging over how best to “reform” the Supreme Court.
My contribution is as follows: I reject the premise.

About the Author
Charles C. W. Cooke is a senior editor at National Review and the host of The Charles C. W. Cooke Podcast.
Advertisement
Advertisement
In the pages of America’s newspapers and magazines, there is a debate raging over how best to “reform” the Supreme Court.
My contribution is as follows: I reject the premise.

About the Author
Charles C. W. Cooke is a senior editor at National Review and the host of The Charles C. W. Cooke Podcast.
Advertisement
Advertisement
By continuing, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.
Comments