In Magic in the Moonlight, Woody Allenโ€™s latest โ€œreturn to form,โ€ the once-comic filmmaker reminds moviegoers โ€” for the umpteenth time โ€” that โ€œlife has no meaning.โ€ This blandly decadent philosophy, a sour concession between two lovers, makes sense only if oneโ€™s career is repeating the same tired, nihilistic point on a perennial basis. Itโ€™s the audience who suffers Allenโ€™s Sisyphean hell.

Magic (ha!) rehashes elements from Allenโ€™s 43 previous films: British illusionist Stanley Crawford (Colin Firth) is induced to practice his sideline as a debunker of professional mystics by investigating American clairvoyant Sophie Baker (Emma Stone), who holds sรฉances for a rich widow and her infatuated son. Typical Allen characters, Stanley and Sophie are both con artists of sorts. He performs on stage as faux Chinese magician Wei Ling-soo and she gloms off wealthy customers; each dependent on various gullible patrons โ€” a close parallel to Allenโ€™s own career. (Even this filmโ€™s clichรฉ title is for suckers.)

Stanley ironically, or disingenuously, is a skeptic, challenging Sophieโ€™s spiritualism until they fall in love โ€” a predictable but tedious-to-watch gimmick. Allenโ€™s unoriginal narrative and lack of visual expression stand out only for being eternally supported by media mavens devoted to celebrating his auteur status. This includes their tolerance for Allenโ€™s insistent culture-mongering โ€” from quirky reliance on idiosyncratic music scores (mashing up Gershwin, Ravel, Stravinsky) to his Continental affectations and middlebrow name-dropping (Stanley quotes Hobbes: โ€œLife is nasty, brutish and shortโ€).

These anachronisms might be amusing if they gave enlightenment โ€” the way a great artist like Jacques Demy referenced other movies and fairytales in his explorations of desire. (Demyโ€™s masterworks Lola and The Umbrellas of Cherbourg are now available in a newly remastered Criterion box set, โ€œThe Essential Jacques Demy.โ€) But Allenโ€™s cocktail-party references are trite means of toadying up to his followers. Intellectually insecure, they mistake Allenโ€™s small-minded, tin-hearted conceits for compassion, romance, or good humor. (Stanleyโ€™s gripes are mean-spirited, not funny.)

Stanley rails against othersโ€™ naรฏvetรฉ, priding himself as a non-believer (โ€œfrom the sรฉance table to the Vatican and beyondโ€) and scoffs at Sophieโ€™s fancies, โ€œHere comes the usual theatrical fertilizer.โ€ Heโ€™s a Darwin follower who wants to visit the Galapagos Islands; yet Allenโ€™s true hoodwink โ€” the filmโ€™s radiant, scenic Riviera setting, photographed by Darius Khondji โ€” is undercut by cynicism. Oohing-aahing fans merely recognize Allen trespassing on Merchant-Ivory territory. Stanley and Sophieโ€™s mix of European sophistication and American guile recalls Allenโ€™s fatuous hit Midnight in Paris. Itโ€™s all, as Stanley harrumphs, bilge.

Firth and Stoneโ€™s infelicitous pairing suggests a Pygmalion rip-off (accent on pig โ€” theyโ€™re Allenโ€™s usual smart guy/dithering gal), but minus Shawโ€™s articulation of the frisson of battling egos. These are stock characters in โ€œloveโ€ such as Allen doesnโ€™t believe in (their prayerful contemplation embarrasses Shaw) or that Allenโ€™s static images simply canโ€™t convey. Dull wide shots are not kinetic, sensual, or spiritual. Allenโ€™s vain, deceitful tricksters remain โ€” like himself โ€” insensitive to other peopleโ€™s pain.

***

โ€œLetโ€™s try it this way,โ€ Luc Besson must have thought when writing and directing Lucy. After the indifferent box-office response to Bessonโ€™s previous female-centered productions โ€” Columbiana, a surprising, dazzling revenge thriller starring Zoe Saldana at her sexy best, and The Lady, a biography of Burmaโ€™s Aung Sang Soo Kyi, movingly played by Michelle Yeoh โ€” the multicultural Besson returns to the surety of a First World protagonist. He cast nubile American Scarlett Johansson as a student in Taipei who gets hustled into an international drug-smuggling scheme and then kills her way to answers and retaliation.

Named Lucy, like the three-million-year-old skeletal fragments of the first female hominid discovered in the early 1970s, La Femme Johansson gets infected by a synthetic CPH4 hormone that changes her metabolism and increases her cerebral capacity โ€” access that gives her primal, superhuman intelligence and sensitivity. The resemblance to prehistoric woman is Bessonโ€™s jest; the opening scene of primate Lucyโ€™s first glimmer of cognizance and curiosity makes a One-World link to blond, Caucasian Lucy.

Itโ€™s an ultimate expression of Bessonโ€™s major interests: The cosmopolitan diversity he enjoys depicting in post-colonial Europe; his fascination with female strength from La Femme Nikita to The Professional, The Fifth Element, and Angel-A as well as Colombiana and The Lady; and his action flick connoisseurship as producer of geopolitically astute action flicks like Transporter and the Taken movies. All that is built into the gimmick of Lucy counting up to gaining 100 percent of her brain power. She becomes a superheroine who โ€” in a Marvel Comics touch โ€” then counts down to her own extinction, a dire fate only neuroscientist Dr. Norman (Morgan Freeman) understands.

The sympatico communication between Lucy and Norman is pure New World Order Besson. Lucyโ€™s smooth, rejuvenated flesh contrasts Normanโ€™s dark, freckled countenance. But thereโ€™s too much commercial calculation in Bessonโ€™s conceit. Lucy and Normanโ€™s complementary youth and age, anger and patience, instinct and wisdom, achieve nothing comparable to the rapport Yeoh and David Thewlis had in The Lady. In hasty, sentimental bits with her mother and a school roommate, Lucy lacks Colombianaโ€™s interior romantic life. Sheโ€™s just a killing machine. Her morphing intelligence and special powers are given loopy explanation (to appeal to nerds who liked the movie Looper?). Yet this new form of anthropological, Glock-9 sci-fi needs genuine philosophical exploration, perhaps like Alain Resnaisโ€™s sci-fi foray, Je tโ€™aime, Je tโ€™aime, or a moral response to violence like Clark Kentโ€™s synthesis of earthly stimuli in Man of Steel. Lucyโ€™s vision of radio signals as rainbows suggests that Besson appreciated Zack Snyderโ€™s vision.

As Lucy gets weirder and less satisfying, it suggests an unofficial sequel to Johanssonโ€™s previous films, the ghastly Under the Skin where she played an alien killbot and the insipid Her where she voiced a computer operating system. At least Besson provides this pouty film star some apt dialog: โ€œLife was given to us a million years ago. What have we done with it?โ€ For himself, Besson manages two intriguing bits: When Lucy kisses an Arab cop (Amr Waked) and tells him โ€œYouโ€™re a reminderโ€ and a DePalma-style scene where she likens fast-motion film to human experience: โ€œTime is the only measure of existence.โ€ Flashy and pithy. Take that, Richard Linklater!

***

Jonathan Demmeโ€™s film version of The Master Builder should have been the revelatory political movie of the moment (a distinction that rests instead with Vincere, Marco Bellocchioโ€™s analysis of a nationโ€™s mass hysteria over a political leader). Henrik Ibsenโ€™s 1892 play scrutinized a celebrated architectโ€™s selfish use of influence, analyzing the psychology of power and the cult of personality. Coming close to the sympathetic Richard Nixon satire Robert Altman achieved in Secret Honor, Demmeโ€™s compassion is blocked by the lead performance of Wallace Shawn, whose cartoonishness nearly destroys Ibsenโ€™s insight.

Now titled A Master Builder, this adaptation is another collaboration between Shawn and Andre Gregory, whose My Dinner with Andre (an acquired taste) was filmed by the late eclectic adept Louis Malle. Humanist master Demme wasnโ€™t given enough latitude. Ibsenโ€™s psychological tragedy isnโ€™t Demmeโ€™s thing. Shawnโ€™s rewrite invokes dream logic, which Demme uses to make the female characters especially compassionate โ€” as in his masterpieces Beloved and Rachel Getting Married. Yet the central expose of a manโ€™s vanity and paranoia should have contemporary relevance as in PiLโ€™s โ€œOpen and Revolvingโ€ and Morrisseyโ€™s โ€œOboe Concertoโ€ โ€” songs that pop adept Demme surely knows. But, unfortunately, he doesnโ€™t provide the timely connection.

โ€” Film critic Armond White is author of The Resistance: Ten Years of Pop Culture That Shook the World and the forthcoming What We Donโ€™t Talk About When We Talk About the Movies.