If PP wants to secure its access to state money, it merely needs to bifurcate its abortionizing (to coin a term) from health care services such as pregnancy testing and STD screening, etc. But it wonโ€™t, so some states are trying to exclude PP from Medicaid payments. on the theory that since currency is fungible, such payments indirectly support abortionโ€“even though Medicaid doesnโ€™t pay for the procedure thanks to the Hyde Amendment.

Indiana tried, and got shot down (so far) by a federal judge because the state accepts federal money. But Texas can cut off fundsโ€“at least for now, because the Feds pulled its money out. From the LA Times story:

The clinics receive funding through the Texas Womenโ€™s Health Program, or WHP, run with $5 million in state money and $35 million from the federal government. But federal officials withdrew their contribution earlier this year when the state moved to exclude Planned Parenthood clinics.
On Tuesday, the three-judge panel ruled that Texas can restrict state funding, citing the affiliation of the clinics as promoting abortion. โ€œTexasโ€™ authority to directly regulate the content of its own program necessarily includes the power to limit the identifying marks that program grantees are authorized to use. Identifying marks represent messages,โ€ the judges wrote. โ€œIf the organizations participating in the WHP are authorized to use marks associated with the pro-abortion point of viewโ€”like the Planned Parenthood markโ€”Texasโ€™ choice to disfavor abortion is eviscerated, just as it would be if the organizations promoted abortion through pamphlets or video presentations.โ€

If this sticks, it is a very big deal and provides a way forward for other states.

Correctives are available to both PP and Obamaโ€™s HHS if they want the group to regain eligibility for Texas medical funding. But doing so would create huge cracks in the foundation of abortion-industrial complex, so donโ€™t look for either to budge.