The Case against U.S. Involvement in Ukraine, in Plain English

America’s geopolitical willpower is not a self-renewing resource that regenerates its strength the more we exercise it.

Share this story

Servicemen of the 12th Special Forces Brigade Azov of the National Guard of Ukraine prepare to fire an LH-70 howitzer towards Russian troops at a position near a frontline at an undisclosed location in Donetsk Region, Ukraine, November 22, 2023.

Alina Smutko/Reuters

Last week the Senate passed a foreign-aid bill including over $60 billion in weapons and munitions to be made in the U.S. and donated to Ukraine. There are obvious questions to raise about this. Given that this is less money for fewer weapons than were sent to power last year’s counteroffensive, how does the U.S. expect this to change the situation on the ground in Ukraine? Can anyone really say the bill increases America’s military-industrial readiness if it further commits America to a conflict that is devouring munitions faster than we can produce them?

Instead of answering these questions, Republican senators who supported the appropriation set about characterizing their opponents and anyone who doubts the utility of more aid to Ukraine as ignoramuses or the victims of demagogues, or implying that they were deficient in love of country.

Michael Brendan Dougherty

About the Author

Michael Brendan Dougherty

Michael Brendan Dougherty is a senior writer at National Review Online.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement