The Climate-Change Hysterics May Be Wrong, But They’re Not Sorry

By overpromising and underdelivering, the climatological community has done more reputational damage to itself than its critics ever could.

Share this story

Activists protest for the U.S. government to take action on climate change and reject the use of fossil fuels in New York City, September 17, 2023.

Eduardo Munoz/Reuters

‘We cannot wait for speeches when the sea is rising around us all the time,” said Simon Kofe, the one-time foreign minister of the Pacific island nation of Tuvalu, in a 2021 address. Kofe’s warning was the kind of boilerplate climate-change catastrophism to which all save the most dedicated activists long ago became inured. It wouldn’t have made any waves if Kofe hadn’t delivered his missive standing in hip-deep water, flanked by United Nations and Tuvaluan flags, and wearing a smartly tailored suit. The theatrics made the point Kofe’s formulaic rhetoric could not.

Indeed, the prospect that many of the world’s low-lying island nations and coastal enclaves will soon be subsumed due to rising sea levels has been a feature of climate-change alarmism for decades. “I think one day we will disappear,” one Tuvaluan mourned in a 2019 interview with the Guardian. “You’re making this island disappear,” read the accusatory CNN headline that graced a breathless 2015 article castigating its audience for failing to save the Marshall Islands from inundation. The oceans will “completely cover” the Maldives “within the next 30 years,” a 1988 piece in the Canberra Times warned. “But the end of the Maldives and its 200,000 people could come sooner if drinking water supplies dry up by 1992, as predicted.”

Noah Rothman

About the Author

Noah Rothman

Noah Rothman is a senior writer at National Review. His third book, Blood and Progress: A Century of Left-Wing Violence, was published by Hachette in May 2026.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement