The Economist has weighed into the debate over permitless concealed carry, and, in so doing, has repeated almost every bad argument that has ever been marshaled in opposition to the trend.
Its piece starts by asking a question, of sorts:
The magazine trots out nearly every bad argument opponents of the policy have ever used.
Share this story
Gun enthusiasts inspect firearms during the annual National Rifle Association convention in Dallas, Texas, May 5, 2018.
Lucas Jackson/Reuters
The Economist has weighed into the debate over permitless concealed carry, and, in so doing, has repeated almost every bad argument that has ever been marshaled in opposition to the trend.
Its piece starts by asking a question, of sorts:

About the Author
Charles C. W. Cooke is a senior editor at National Review and the host of The Charles C. W. Cooke Podcast.
Advertisement
Advertisement
The Economist has weighed into the debate over permitless concealed carry, and, in so doing, has repeated almost every bad argument that has ever been marshaled in opposition to the trend.
Its piece starts by asking a question, of sorts:
By continuing, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

About the Author
Charles C. W. Cooke is a senior editor at National Review and the host of The Charles C. W. Cooke Podcast.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Comments