The End of Roe?

If so, the work continues.

Share this story

Pro-life demonstrators outside the Supreme Court ahead of arguments in Dobbs v. Jackson Womenโ€™s Health in Washington, D.C., December 1, 2021.

Jonathan Ernst/Reuters

For about a half second after the leak of the Supreme Court draft opinion in the Mississippi abortion case that may throw out Roe v. Wade, people who support Roe dropped the talking points and told the truth. Gavin Newsom, the governor of California, tweeted that if men could get pregnant, of course abortion would be legal. Joe Biden talked about the right to abort a child. The dropping of the filter was a refreshing reprieve from the typical euphemisms.

For most of my adult life, we havenโ€™t heard the a-word. The National Abortion Rights Action League became NARAL Pro-Choice America when I was in my twenties. Of late, the Left hasnโ€™t talked about a supposed โ€œwar on womenโ€ waged by those who want to protect a mother and child. Instead, the phrase โ€œbirthing personโ€ has been introduced, meant to include women who identify as men who get pregnant. While claiming to be inclusive, the term effectively attacks the beauty of motherhood. Faithful to this trend, a makeshift sign protesting a pro-life prayer vigil in a lower Manhattan Catholic Church recently asked us to stop harassing โ€œabortion patients.โ€ By โ€œharassing,โ€ they meant that once a month a group of us gathers for Mass at Old St. Patrickโ€™s Cathedral Basilica and then walks about a block to pray across the street from a Planned Parenthood for the women and girls who find themselves there and for the conversion of those who work there.

KL

About the Author

Kathryn Jean Lopez

Kathryn Jean Lopez is a senior fellow at the National Review Institute and the religion editor of National Review. Sign up for her weekly newsletter here. She is the author of A Year with the Mystics: Visionary Wisdom for Daily Living.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement