The Lesson of Judge Dugan’s Obstruction Case

The immunity that public officials need to do their jobs is not a get-out-of-jail-free card for their nonofficial acts.

Share this story

Wisconsin-based Judge Hannah Dugan arrives for the first day of trial, in which she’s accused of helping a migrant appearing in her courtroom evade a planned immigration arrest, in Milwaukee, Wis., December 15, 2025.

Sara Stathas/Reuters

As our Kamden Mulder reports, Wisconsin State Judge Hannah Dugan, who attempted to help an illegal alien evade capture by federal agents, was found guilty of felony obstruction by a federal jury on Thursday. Illogically, the jury acquitted Dugan of concealing a person from arrest, a misdemeanor.

The contradictory outcomes suggest that the verdict was a compromise arrived at by jurors in Milwaukee, a so-called sanctuary city. There, voters habitually elect Democrats who, like the progressive Judge Dugan, oppose rigorous enforcement of federal immigration laws.

Andrew C. McCarthy

About the Author

Andrew C. McCarthy

Andrew C. McCarthy is a senior fellow at National Review Institute, an NR contributing editor, and author of Ball of Collusion: The Plot to Rig an Election and Destroy a Presidency.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement