The Nationalization of Elections Is Anti-American

Our Founding Fathers fought for our right not to care about who New Jersey elects as governor.

Share this story

New Jersey Governor-elect Mikie Sherrill and Lieutenant Governor–elect Dale Caldwell celebrate at an election-night rally in East Brunswick, N.J., November 4, 2025.

Mike Segar/Reuters

On Tuesday, Kentucky Secretary of State Michael Adams said his office had been receiving some unusual calls: Residents were confused about why the polls were closed. He explained on Twitter (X) that the polls were not open because Kentucky did not have any elections this year. “You cannot vote today in Kentucky for the mayor of New York City or the Governor of Virginia,” he said, adding, “Sorry.”

Granted, there were some smaller elections all throughout the country — for instance, the City of Cincinnati, which sits right across the border from Kentucky, had a mayoral election. But the belief that elections of national importance were taking place yesterday is simply evidence of a psychosis in American politics brought about by the nationalization of our political process.

Christian Schneider

About the Author

Christian Schneider

Christian Schneider is a National Review contributor and writes the Anti-Knowledge newsletter. He is a co-host of the podcast Wasn't That Special: 50 Years of SNL.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement