The New York Times Spreads Misinformation About Extreme Weather Deaths

For many, the New York Times and the various federal and international agencies that it often cites are trusted sources for information on climate change. But on one of the risks of climate change — deaths by extreme weather — that trust is misplaced. The following examples from the last two years illustrate that, often enough, those sources spread false or misleading information on that issue.

The science regarding worldwide deaths from extreme weather is clear: Deaths caused by extreme cold are between nine and 17 times higher than those caused by extreme heat, according to peer-reviewed studies published in The Lancet in 2024, 2021, and 2015. The Times, however, has reported otherwise: “Heat waves cause more deaths globally than all other natural disasters combined.” The Times claim is unsourced, so its justification is unclear, but it clearly contradicts the scientific evidence — something that the paper usually notes is a trait of misinformation.

DS

About the Author

David Seidemann

David Seidemann is a professor of earth and environmental science at Brooklyn College.

Featured Tags

For many, the New York Times and the various federal and international agencies that it often cites are trusted sources for information on climate change. But on one of the risks of climate change — deaths by extreme weather — that trust is misplaced. The following examples from the last two years illustrate that, often enough, those sources spread false or misleading information on that issue.

The science regarding worldwide deaths from extreme weather is clear: Deaths caused by extreme cold are between nine and 17 times higher than those caused by extreme heat, according to peer-reviewed studies published in The Lancet in 2024, 2021, and 2015. The Times, however, has reported otherwise: “Heat waves cause more deaths globally than all other natural disasters combined.” The Times claim is unsourced, so its justification is unclear, but it clearly contradicts the scientific evidence — something that the paper usually notes is a trait of misinformation.