The ‘No Blank Check for Ukraine’ Fallacy

Biden’s policy has been to send Ukraine enough arms to avoid defeat but not enough to win. Republicans should not be searching for a policy that’s even worse.

Share this story

Ukrainian servicemen fire a 2S7 Pion self-propelled gun toward Russian positions on a frontline near Bakhmut, Donetsk Region, Ukraine, January 24, 2023.

Oleksandr Ratushniak/Reuters

The Republican Party is now split between two camps: those, such as Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.), House Foreign Affairs Committee chairman Michael McCaul (R., Texas), and presidential candidate Nikki Haley, who have called for giving Ukraine all the weapons it needs to repel the Russian invasion; and those, such as Representatives Marjorie Taylor Greene (R., Ga.) and Matt Gaetz (R., Fla.), as well as former president Donald Trump, who have called for cutting off arms shipments to Ukraine, thereby letting the Russians win.

This divide is intractable. Nevertheless, some Republican politicians and writers have attempted to finesse it with a compromise strategy. According to this faction, we should continue to support Ukraine with arms for a while, but set an upper limit to our support. There should be “no blank check.” Instead, once our limit is reached, they say, we should inform Ukraine that our patience is at an end, so it should take whatever terms Vladimir Putin is willing to give them.

Robert Zubrin

About the Author

Robert Zubrin

Robert Zubrin is an aerospace engineer and the author of twelve books, most recently The New World on Mars: What We Can Create on the Red Planet.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement