The failure of House Republicans to agree on a new speaker on the first day of Congress was an embarrassment for the party. But it is not without historical precedent.
The title of “speaker” dates back to the medieval English Parliament:
The current messy, rancorous fight to pick a speaker of the House is far from unprecedented.
Share this story
House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy (R., Calif.) listens to members during a fourth round of voting for a new Speaker of the House at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., January 4, 2023.
Jonathan Ernst/Reuters
The failure of House Republicans to agree on a new speaker on the first day of Congress was an embarrassment for the party. But it is not without historical precedent.
The title of “speaker” dates back to the medieval English Parliament:

About the Author
Dan McLaughlin is a senior writer at National Review Online and a fellow at National Review Institute.
Advertisement
Advertisement
The failure of House Republicans to agree on a new speaker on the first day of Congress was an embarrassment for the party. But it is not without historical precedent.
The title of “speaker” dates back to the medieval English Parliament:

About the Author
Dan McLaughlin is a senior writer at National Review Online and a fellow at National Review Institute.
Advertisement
Advertisement
By continuing, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.
Comments