The Senate’s Trial

As President Trump’s impeachment leaves the House, the upper chamber needs to be what the Founders expected it to be.

Share this story

U.S. Senate Chamber c.1873

Library of Congress’ Brady-Handy collection/Wikimedia Commons

We have spent the last several weeks intensely debating the Founders’ view of impeachment. Now that the House has actually impeached the president, it’s time to pay attention to the Founders’ view of the Senate.

We know that a Senate’s trial of impeachments is supposed to be more solemn and impartial than the House’s own impeachment proceedings. Alexander Hamilton stresses this in the now-famous Federalist No. 65. Even House Democrats acknowledged this throughout their process; Chairman Schiff, for example, compared the House’s role to that of a prosecutor’s grand jury, whose job is not to decide whether the accused is actually guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, but whether there is the bare minimum of evidence necessary to charge the accused with a crime. In impeachment, the House’s job is to bring accusations; the Senate’s job is to sit in judgment of the House’s accusations and the official being accused. But how should the Senate actually carry out this constitutional responsibility?

Adam J. White

About the Author

Adam J. White

Adam J. White is a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and a co-director of George Mason University’s Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement