The Supreme Court’s Chance to Transcend Roe’s Outdated Science on Fetal Development

Science has moved past the flawed understandings that underpinned Roe. The leaked draft of Dobbs suggests the Court now understands this.

Share this story

dimarik/iStock/Getty Images

The unthinkable has happened: an unprecedented leak from the depths of the Supreme Court. The public reaction has been fierce and unbridled over Justice Samuel Alito’s opinion, especially on the pro-abortion left. But the reality is that if Roe falls, the sky will remain safely overhead. What will happen is that, from state to state, citizens and their elected officials, participating in the democratic process, will be allowed to pass laws that make sense to them. No longer inhibited by a decades-old decision from seven Supreme Court justices, our nation’s political bodies will be able to write and enact laws that reflect modern science and current American sensibilities about unborn children.

So much has changed since 1973, when pro-abortion arguments focused on the inability to pin down exactly when life begins and when abortion defenders confidently held that fetuses in the later stages of gestation could not feel the pain of dismemberment. As explained in a friend-of-the-court brief I submitted alongside two other female physicians, scientific advancements since Roe have put an end to uncertainties about such questions.

Grazie Pozo Christie

About the Author

Grazie Pozo Christie

Dr. Grazie Pozo Christie is a physician and a member of the Florida Board of Education. She writes widely on science and cultural issues — her work has appeared in National Review, USA Today, the Washington Post, the New York Times, and Angelus News, where she is a columnist. She lives with her husband and five children in Miami, Florida.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement