The Trump Administration’s Actions in Venezuela Are Constitutional

Not only was the U.S. capture of Nicolás Maduro legal, but it also has significant precedent.

Share this story

President Donald Trump speaks as Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth look on after a U.S. strike in Venezuela that captured President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Fla., January 3, 2026.

Jonathan Ernst/Reuters

The president unilaterally launches a lightning-fast assault to overthrow a foreign dictator who harms Americans, oppresses his own people, and continues to threaten our national security. Critics accuse the president of violating the Constitution’s grant of power to Congress to declare war.

That may describe President Donald Trump’s order to execute the astounding snatch-and-grab of Nicolás Maduro, the leader of Venezuela. But it also describes President Barack Obama’s 2011 campaign to bring down the Libyan regime of Moammar Qaddafi. Or President Bill Clinton’s 2000 air war against Serbia, which stopped its invasion of Kosovo and led to the overthrow and trial of Slobodan Milošević. Or, in the example most similar to today’s, President George H. W. Bush’s 1989 decision to invade Panama, arrest its military leader Manuel Noriega, and try him for drug-trafficking.

John Yoo

About the Author

John Yoo

John Yoo is the Thomas W. Smith Senior Fellow at the Civitas Institute, University of Texas at Austin; Emanuel S. Heller Professor of Law at the University of California at Berkeley; and a nonresident senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. He is a co-author of the just-released two-volume American Constitutional Law (Routledge, 2026).

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement