The U.N. Is Making Trump’s Case on the Human Rights Council

The council’s anti-Israel bias and toleration of human-rights abusers vindicate the administration’s decision to withdraw.

Share this story

The United Nations Human Rights Council meets in Geneva, Switzerland, February 26, 2025.

Denis Balibouse/Reuters

Few events as poignantly underscored the lamentable record of the United Nations on human rights as the awarding of a Nobel Peace Prize to the former U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, Navi Pillay. And yet, Pillay, a dedicated antisemite whose Nobel was celebrated by Hamas, is an apt avatar for the U.N. Human Rights Council, an organization whose mission and work are regularly at odds.

No surprise, then, that a 2025 Trump executive order once again ended U.S. participation with the HRC, criticizing it for protecting “human rights abusers by allowing them to use the organization to shield themselves from scrutiny.” This echoes more detailed criticism in 2018 when the U.S. similarly ceased its participation, citing anti-Israel bias, human rights violators regularly winning seats on the council, and willful inattention to “the misery inflicted by regimes in Venezuela, Cuba, Zimbabwe, and China.”

BS

About the Author

Brett Schaefer

Brett Schaefer is a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute focusing on the United Nations and international organizations.

DP

About the Author

Danielle Pletka

Danielle Pletka is a distinguished senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and the host, with Marc Thiessen, of the podcast What the Hell Is Going On? and the related Substack.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement