What is the goal of the new social-justice politics that emerged in 2014 and gained steam during the Trump years?
One school holds that the virtue-signaling and grievance politics are a kind of moat that the upwardly mobile are creating around their class. It gives them an excuse to eject the deplorables from the community of man. In a very perceptive essay at UnHerd, Matthew Crawford writes that social-justice politics enables the moral and political secession of elites from their nation. “Very simply: if the nation is fundamentally racist, sexist and homophobic, I owe it nothing. More than that, conscience demands that I repudiate it.” As we’ve written in this space, this secession of elites is aimed at dissolving the moral and political restraints on self-seeking. That’s why anti-nationalist politics are so often anti-democratic, even when they claim to speak for democracy.






Comments