The Wrong Answer to Cheney’s Anti-Trump Stand

Reasonable minds can disagree on Liz Cheney’s role in the GOP, but the choice of Elise Stefanik to replace her bodes poorly for more important battles ahead.

Share this story

Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) speaks to the media after the Republican caucus meeting in Washington, D.C., May 14, 2021.

Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters

I am much less concerned about who holds the No. 3 position in Republican House leadership than I am about who bats third for the Mets. And it’s not that I don’t care about politics. I do, a lot . . . particularly about Republicans getting it in gear to mount an effective challenge to the Biden-era Democrats (whether we think of our feckless president as leading the hard Left’s charge or being rolled over by it).

I also like Liz Cheney a lot. I don’t agree with her about everything, but I don’t even agree with myself about everything. That said, I didn’t care that she was the chair of the House Republican Conference. Weeks ago, I was nudged into caring, but only because Republicans were making the molehill of No. 3 status into a mountain, over whether Cheney deserved to be ousted for saying true things about the 2020 presidential election.

Andrew C. McCarthy

About the Author

Andrew C. McCarthy

Andrew C. McCarthy is a senior fellow at National Review Institute, an NR contributing editor, and author of Ball of Collusion: The Plot to Rig an Election and Destroy a Presidency.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement