There’s No Appeasing Transgender Activists

When debating trans activists, it’s best not to use preferred pronouns or defensively emphasize one’s heartfelt sympathy for “trans people.” Doing so is playing into a trap. Much of what is intended as courtesy is interpreted as concession. And much of what is intended as a show of good faith is interpreted as weakness.

Consider J. K. Rowling. In writing her defense of women’s sex-based rights, the Harry Potter author has repeatedly underscored her liberal sympathies, writing: “I know and love trans people,” “I respect every trans person’s right to live any way that feels authentic to them,” “I feel nothing but empathy and solidarity with trans women who have been abused by men,” etc.

About the Author

Madeleine Kearns

Madeleine Kearns is a former staff writer at National Review.

Featured Tags

When debating trans activists, it’s best not to use preferred pronouns or defensively emphasize one’s heartfelt sympathy for “trans people.” Doing so is playing into a trap. Much of what is intended as courtesy is interpreted as concession. And much of what is intended as a show of good faith is interpreted as weakness.

Consider J. K. Rowling. In writing her defense of women’s sex-based rights, the Harry Potter author has repeatedly underscored her liberal sympathies, writing: “I know and love trans people,” “I respect every trans person’s right to live any way that feels authentic to them,” “I feel nothing but empathy and solidarity with trans women who have been abused by men,” etc.