Trump Should Be Acquitted in Manhattan

The simple fact is that DA Alvin Bragg can’t prove his case.

Share this story

Former president Donald Trump leaves Manhattan Supreme Court on the 14th day of his hush-money trial in New York City, May 10, 2024.

Curtis Means/Pool via Reuters

Let’s put aside all of the constitutional objections to Alvin Bragg’s prosecution of Donald Trump — objections premised on the shredding of both federal and state due-process guarantees. Trump ought to be acquitted for the simplest of reasons: Prosecutors can’t prove their case — neither the case the grand jury actually charged, 34 counts of felony business-records falsification, nor the case that elected progressive Democratic district attorney Alvin Bragg has imagined into existence, an uncharged conspiracy to steal the 2016 election by suppressing politically damaging information in violation of federal campaign-finance law.

For all the heated rhetoric, there is not much meaningful disagreement about the facts of the case. At least, that is, insofar as we’re talking about conduct that bears on the only significant issue, the question of whether Trump fraudulently caused his business records to be falsified.

Andrew C. McCarthy

About the Author

Andrew C. McCarthy

Andrew C. McCarthy is a senior fellow at National Review Institute, an NR contributing editor, and author of Ball of Collusion: The Plot to Rig an Election and Destroy a Presidency.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement