Trump’s Strike on Iran Was Constitutional

The president acted to protect the nation’s security within the powers granted to his office by the Constitution.

Share this story

President Donald Trump delivers an address to the nation following U.S. strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities alongside Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth at the White House in Washington, D.C., June 21, 2025.

Carlos Barria/Pool via Reuters

America’s weekend strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities met little resistance in the skies above Tehran. But President Donald Trump may meet more serious opposition at home. Many members of the left and right wings of Congress claim that Trump has violated the Constitution and the War Powers Resolution in a way that might warrant impeachment. These critics, however, misrepresent the wartime relationship of the executive and legislative branches and distract from the real congressional check on the president: the power of the purse.

Late on Saturday night, the U.S. Air Force used B-2 stealth bombers to drop massive bunker-busting bombs on the Fordow uranium enrichment plant in Iran, while the U.S. Navy bombarded the nuclear facilities at Isfahan and Natanz with Tomahawk cruise missiles. In a White House address, Trump called the attack “a spectacular military success” that left Iran’s nuclear sites “completely and totally obliterated.”

John Yoo

About the Author

John Yoo

John Yoo is the Thomas W. Smith Senior Fellow at the Civitas Institute, University of Texas at Austin; Emanuel S. Heller Professor of Law at the University of California at Berkeley; and a nonresident senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. He is a co-author of the just-released two-volume American Constitutional Law (Routledge, 2026).

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement