Walsh Stem Cell
The ad represents everything people hate about politics. First, it is dishonest. It has a woman claiming she will get Alzheimerโs in twenty years, strongly implying that ES cells could cure her. But, it is well known that ESCR is highly unlikely to provide a cure for Alzheimerโs disease. One notable researcher even stated that โpeople need a fairy taleโ as the reason the biotech sector is generally permitting people to believe this falsehood about ESCRโsheer mendacity promoted blatantly in this ad.
Second, notice the hubris. Last year the Feds shelled out about $50 million for human ESCR. Yet, the ad has a little girl accuse the Congressman being attacked in the ad for refusing to overturn President Bushโs policy, as somehow โdeciding who lives and who dies.โ Well if that is true, than any spending under the levels โthe scientistsโ want, is deciding who lives and who dies. Moreover, the Congressmanโs vote was not โagainstโ federal funding of ESCR, but to preserve President Bushโs existing policy. That is not the same thing at all.
Third, as usual the tremendous advances occurring in adult stem cell research are utterly ignored by the ad, which thereby implies that ESCR is the only hope. For example, mice have been cured of the very kind of diabetes that the little girl in the ad says she has, and using adult stem cells and other bodily substances, not embryonic sources. The FDA has approved human trials, but the Harvard scientists canโt find enough funding to begin.
Be very clear: This ad is not about โscience.โ It is not about โcures.โ It is about the values of the bioethics/biotech community prevailing in the political arena and about opening the spigot to billions of taxpayer dollars to vested financial interests. And to get from here to there, it unashamedly exploits the anguish of disease sufferers and their families.
Shameful, but alas, probably effective.






Comments