Washington and the Presidential Precedent

Over 200 years ago, Washington understood the importance of being exceedingly careful with presidential power.

Share this story

Detail of Washington Delivering His Inaugural Address, April 1789

Library of Congress

When George Washington was president, he understood the power of being first. His statement that “I walk on untrodden ground” recognized that, in the words of his biographer Joseph Ellis, “everything he did set a precedent.” For that reason, Washington was careful with the precedents he set, understanding that his successors would either follow them, or be asked to justify why they were not doing so.

Washington — whose birthday we celebrate this week — understood that the “president” concept was a controversial one. It was hotly debated in the early days of the nation; some argued it wasn’t even needed or that power should be divided among three magistrates. Others argued for an elected majesty. In the end, the Founders settled on a chief executive charged with ensuring the execution of the law, known simply, almost prosaically, as “Mr. President.”

Tevi Troy

About the Author

Tevi Troy

Tevi Troy is a senior fellow at the Ronald Reagan Institute and a senior scholar at Yeshiva University’s Straus Center. He is the author of The Power and the Money: The Epic Clashes Between Commanders in Chief and Titans of Industry.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement