Watering Down the SAT Weakens Meritocracy

If we want a society that truly rewards talent and effort, we must preserve and strengthen the tools that make upward mobility possible.

Share this story

ViktorCap/iStock/Getty Images

Generations of Americans have sat for the SAT, long the surest social escalator for talented, but overlooked, kids to win seats at the nationโ€™s most elite universities. The SAT has been woven into the fabric of the American educational experience, serving as a common benchmark that allowed students to compete on a, relatively level, playing field to show their academic promise. Sadly, misguided DEI changes to the SAT threaten to unravel this legacy, eroding both the principle of meritocracy and what few shreds of intellectual rigor remain in our educational system.

For decades, the SAT has served as a great equalizer and standardized measure that allows students, regardless of background, to showcase their abilities and earn a place at top institutions. For elite universities, studies in 2024 show that SAT scores were 3.9 times more predictive of a studentโ€™s success than high school GPA. Admissions offices from Harvard, Yale, and Brown have even publicly acknowledged this fact, with Yale stating, โ€œTest scores are the single largest predictor of a studentโ€™s academic performance.โ€ Even as universities experimented with test-optional policies during the Covid-19 pandemic, the return to mandatory testing at prestigious schools signaled a recognition of the SATโ€™s value as a fair and objective benchmark.

VW

About the Author

Vilda Westh Blanc

Vilda Westh Blanc is a Collegiate Associate at the Manhattan Institute.

TR

About the Author

Tim Rosenberger

Tim Rosenberger is a Legal Policy Fellow at the Manhattan Institute.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement