We Need a National Conversation about National Conversations

Ignore the linguistic central planners and talk about whatever you want.

Share this story

Vice President Kamala Harris gives a speech about abortion rights to mark the 50th anniversary of the Supreme Court decision in the Roe v. Wade case in Tallahassee, Fla., January 22, 2023.

Octavio Jones/Reuters

In February 1907, a small newspaper in Harrisburg, Pa., demanded an “aroused public opinion” about the reckless way in which Americans were now living their lives. The paper condemned people who amused themselves “in a way that endangers the bodies and the very existence of their fellow citizens,” criticizing those who run railroad trains, electric trolleys, and automobiles at a speed “that implies an outrageous spirit of recklessness.”

The paper’s antidote for such carelessness? It suggested a “national conversation” to inspire a “counter-movement” in favor of safety.

Christian Schneider

About the Author

Christian Schneider

Christian Schneider is a National Review contributor and writes the Anti-Knowledge newsletter. He is a co-host of the podcast Wasn't That Special: 50 Years of SNL.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement