What the ‘Anti-Woke’ Crowd Gets Wrong

National Review’s original mission statement makes painfully clear that ‘liberal orthodoxy’ did not just emerge in 2016.

Share this story

Protesters march near the Minneapolis First Police precinct during a demonstration against police brutality and racism in Minneapolis, Minn, June 13, 2020.

kerem Yucel/AFP via Getty Images

I had the pleasure of attending a retreat last weekend for young conservative professionals. “Varieties of conservatism” was the organizing theme of the seminars, and National Review’s 1955 mission statement was included in the readings. Someone mentioned during the class that Buckley was opposing moral relativism. That’s true, but it misses the more important point.

The justification for establishing a forum like National Review was that a dangerous illiberalism, animated by hostility to truth and reason, had already conquered virtually every major institution. My verb tense matters: Buckley et al. were not worried that such a dubious philosophy might eventually capture a few prestigious establishments that failed to engage in an ideological battle. Rather, NR’s founders astutely detected that the radicals had already seized control everywhere it mattered. The publication’s purpose was not merely to argue against an existing ideology but to disrupt its monopolistic power, hence the mission statement’s phrases such as “liberal orthodoxy” and “liberal world” appearing in 1955. The diagnosis was explicit: “And since ideas rule the world, the ideologues, having won over the intellectual class, simply walked in and started to run things. Run just about everything. There never was an age of conformity quite like this one, or a camaraderie quite like the Liberals’.”

Abigail Anthony

About the Author

Abigail Anthony

Abigail Anthony is a staff writer at National Review.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement