Why I’m Cynical about Foreign-Policy Idealism

Biden’s MBS fist bump is just one example of our compromised moral authority.

Share this story

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman fist bumps U.S. President Joe Biden upon his arrival at Al Salman Palace, in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, July 2022.

Bandar Algaloud/Courtesy of Saudi Royal Court/Handout via Reuters

We can’t have moral equivalence. Not with a nation-state that has subjected its neighbor to a frozen, stalemated conflict for the better part of the last decade — a conflict in which it has, disgustingly, bombed multiple hospitals. Not with a regime that murders journalists and funds disruptive political movements elsewhere in its region. Some people would like to forget these facts, but we shouldn’t.

One would expect the foreign-policy idealists — the people who argue that American ideals of freedom should guide our foreign policy — to agree with this simple position. And they do — so long as it’s Russia bombing hospitals and murdering journalists. When Russia does these things, we funnel billions of dollars and matériel to their victims. But when Saudi Arabia does them, we give its tyrannical leader a fist-bump and refuel his jets — and suddenly our foreign-policy idealists say we have to get real, cut our leaders some slack, and recognize the strategic importance of our allies. After all, it’s just a fist bump (plus whatever Biden promised MBS in private).

Michael Brendan Dougherty

About the Author

Michael Brendan Dougherty

Michael Brendan Dougherty is a senior writer at National Review Online.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement